Challenging Traditional Recruitment for Greater Diversity

Shazamme System User • August 22, 2022

Several of us at Cultivate have close friends and whānau who are Neurodiverse. This has opened our eyes to the many superpowers that those who think differently can offer. But equally, we can better appreciate the challenges that living in a world created for the neurotypical can bring. Many of our schools and workplaces still do not appreciate or harness diversity of thought, despite the fact it’s estimated 40% of the population are neurodiverse, with 20% diagnosed and 20% undiagnosed. This includes Autistic, ADHD, OCD, ODD, Aspergers, Depressed or Anxious brains and other conditions.

Society, and workplaces as a reflection, are slowly evolving to embrace diversity of all types, providing a much safer place for everyone to show up as themselves. But, NZ organisations lag the UK and other countries in tackling neurodiversity specifically, despite international research clearly showing the correlation between neurodiversity and improvements in overall culture, engagement, innovation and financial success. Thankfully though, organisations that we have spoken with are very open to learning more.

The elephant in the room when it comes to increasing diversity of thought is the role of recruitment. It’s one thing to embrace diversity of any type for existing staff but are your current hiring practices keeping diversity at the door by alienating or rejecting great talent because your process only suits the neurotypical?

Here at Cultivate we’ve embarked on our own journey to understand and better embrace diversity in recruitment. It’s tough. Old habits are hard to break and every brain is different, so we can’t create a single solution, master it quickly, or get it right every time. But we’re committed to persevering. The good news is whatever is good for the neurodiverse is also good for the neurotypical. So do better for the neurodiverse and everyone wins.

We were encouraged to read that the NZ Police Financial Crime Group recently partnered with Autism NZ to purposely target Autistic talent to join their team as analysts. This and other examples show we’re thankfully not alone.

For us, this cause is more than a competitive advantage and the benefits are far reaching. So we wanted to share our experiences to date in the hope others will join us.

Firstly, we all have to let go of many of the universal and flawed criteria we often fall back on when hiring. Take “good communication” as an example, whatever that is anyway. A firm handshake, eye contact and confident delivery are not universal signs of a great candidate. In fact some of the brightest and more influential people on the planet would have failed this test.

But what else can we do? Well, here’s a few things we’ve done so far, with guidance from the good people at DivergenThinking:

1. Education:

We started with a full day workshop, which included some prep to get a head start on understanding the topic generally. The morning focused on understanding ourselves. After all, it’s harder to understand and appreciate others if we don’t know ourselves. This concluded with us each determining our dominant brain quadrants and how the way our own brain works can impact how we go about our roles, and how we land on others. It also gave us the shared language and model to tie our approach to. 

After lunch we deconstructed our typical recruitment process, looked for where we were making it hardest for some people to shine, and how we might adapt. The next points highlight what we learnt and continue to trial.

2.  Be clear on the behaviours you need for a role:

If we’re really tight on the key behaviours required for success we can avoid those general and irrelevant ‘requirements’. We can then challenge hiring managers accordingly and also consider the sort of brain wiring that might best fit the role. For example, why would you require a ‘strong team player’ for an analytical role when the work is almost entirely autonomous?

3.  Advert writing:

It’s common for job ads to be written through the lens of the author. That is, we subconsciously promote the tasks or benefits that interest us rather than considering what’s important for the ideal audience. It’s becoming more widely understood that ads can be tweaked to appeal to different genders, but we can do the same for the Neurodiverse. For example: If the role would suit the superpowers of the Autistic then writing that “you’ll pride yourself on getting to the bottom of every issue” is a big put off. Why, because Autistic people rightly know that you can’t realistically solve everything. Conversely, we could encourage those with ADHD to apply to our high paced, creative or problem solving roles.

4.  Share your goals publicly:

This is the most important aspect, provided you’re authentic in your intentions. We added a sentence to every job ad, application response email and interview confirmation email that acknowledged the importance of a physiologically safe process for everyone, including the Neurodiverse. We encouraged them to share how we can bring out the best of them, so we can understand and advocate their ‘strengths’ and avoid getting bogged down with any potential ‘weaknesses’. This felt scary at first, until we realised we don’t need to have the answers, as candidates will likely tell us what works (or doesn’t) for them.

5.  The interview:

Frequently this is the most daunting part of the process for neurodiverse applicants. Regrettably, a great deal of energy and anxiety can go into masking traits that might typically be seen as distracting or off-putting. The worry here is that we expect recruiters to become bush psychologists, diagnosing and adapting on the fly. Instead, we’ve focused so far on two areas.

A). Agreeing in advance with the candidate how we can make them most comfortable in the interview. Utilising online or pre-recorded interview tools are useful here. We might also agree to send the questions in advance for those that are highly reflective.


B). We’re also aware that some common questions can be more unhelpful than others. For example: A question like “tell me about your background” is too vague to be helpful for ADHD brains and we should be more specific with what we want to know. A better question would be “Talk me through the duties and achievements of your last 3 roles”.

6.  Other assessments:

Like with interviewing, we just need to determine whether the assessment we’re using fits with the capability and behaviours critical for the role. Role simulations, case studies or psychometric assessments are great, assuming they’re used in the right way, at the right time. Recently a hiring manager asked our preferred candidate for a senior accounting role to complete a ‘job simulation’. This required them to respond back to a question relating to improving business performance via email within 20 mins. We get the sentiment, but the question was vague, and the tight turnaround at odds with the actual requirements of the role.

7.  Onboarding:

We need to agree what a safe and productive onboarding and work environment looks like for the individual brain wiring before they start. Things like quiet spaces in the office, work from home options, desk setup, agreed expectations around communication and outcomes, or even just the best way to welcome them with the team. This is good practice for any new hire, it just becomes more critical for the Neurodiverse.

We’re still learning, so if you have feedback on our journey so far or ideas for how else we can help, reach out here.

Of course, if you identify as neurodiverse and want to discuss how we can better support your job search contact us here.

For more information on Neurodiversity in the workplace, check out our partners at www.divergenthinking.co.nz. They support organisations and individuals on the journey to building a neurodiverse, equitable & inclusive workplace.

By Shazamme System User February 28, 2023
“We have a great culture.” We have all heard it. We have all said it. But what does that mean? Ping-Pong tables, free meals, and beer on tap? No. Yoga, CrossFit classes, and massage chairs? I so need that, but no. The promise of being part of a hip, equity-incentivized, fast growing team? Closer, but still no. Culture is often referred to as “the way things are done around here.” But to be useful, we need to get more specific than that. I’ve been working in HR for over twenty years, and the best companies I’ve worked with have recognized that there are three elements to a culture: behaviors, systems, and practices, all guided by an overarching set of values. A great culture is what you get when all three of these are aligned, and line up with the organization’s espoused values. When gaps start to appear, that’s when you start to see problems — and see great employees leave. These gaps can take many forms. A company might espouse “work-life balance” but not offer paid parental leave or expect people to stay late consistently every night (a behaviors-system gap). You might espouse being a learning organization that develops people, but then not give people the time to actually take classes or learn on the job (system-behaviors gap). Maybe your company tells people to be consensus-builders, but promotes people who are solely authoritative decision makers (behavior-practices gap). Gaps like these are never solved by turning culture over to a Chief Culture Officer or pulling together culture committees. Likewise, inspirational leadership, the repetition of value statements, and letting people be themselves are important, but they are by-products of a healthy culture, not the drivers of one. How, then, do we repair a flagging culture? A place to start is by reviewing the behaviors, systems, and practices in place in your company. Behaviors A common culture-building practice is the creation of value statements. But the real test is how leaders behave; how they enact these values, or don’t. People watch everything leaders do. If leaders are not exhibiting the behaviors that reflect the values, the values are meaningless. Employees also need clarity, but of a different kind. Every employee I have managed would give up their so-called perks for one thing: clear expectations. Given your organizational values, which behaviors consistently get rewarded? Which behaviors lead to promotion? Spend the time identifying the behaviors and skills that express each of your organizational values. For example, if I saw someone exemplifying the value of “teamwork,” what would she be doing? What would she not be doing? One organization might identify teamwork behavior as “collaborates effectively through helping others.” Another might interpret a teamwork behavior as “collaborates effectively through encouraging productive disagreements.” Both can be done, but which behavior is expected and encouraged at one company vs. another? Clarifying expected behaviors for employees holds leaders accountable as well. Does a manager value face-time more than outcomes? Is a leader always ten minutes late to a meeting? How often does starting a meeting five minutes late roll into people showing up unprepared? These are the real-world behaviors of culture and values. Before we realize it, the organization becomes known for late meetings, face-time, or reactive and apathetic leadership. Employees become reactive. And then we wonder why we have an attrition problem. When expected behaviors are clear, we can focus our time on practicing those behaviors rather than spending our time on trying to identify them. Accountability becomes easier to measure and success easier to attain. Systems Every process that is created, every system installed, every technology that is used, every structure that is designed, every job title that is given will reinforce or dilute the culture. There are five key systems that are important to the overall cultural system: Hiring. Clarity around behavioral expectations allows us to bring much-needed clarity to the hiring process. Instead of the common default to hiring for “cultural fit” — which in practice is usually an excuse for hiring people we find likable or similar to us — we can look for behaviors that are cultural complements. This moves us away from the tendency to hire people who think the same and towards a company built on diversity of backgrounds, perspectives, and ideas that complement culture while also enriching it. Strategy and goal setting. These activities do two things, culture-wise: rally people around similar goals while also providing guidance on outcomes employees are expected to produce. Assessing. How are behaviors assessed? How often are they reviewed? Is feedback shared consistently, and is it weighted based on who said it? Lack of trust or questions about what behavioral standards will be used will create political and fear-based environments. Developing. When employees feel that professional development, feedback assessments, or engagement surveys are irrelevant, it’s usually because the questions don’t tie back to what the organization actually reinforces and rewards. Culture problems can also arise when a “safe learning environment” turns into a way to punish employees for low scores rather than a way to help them grow. Rewarding. What is the criteria to become a manager, director, vice president? What are the expected behaviors that earn a person said title? What technical and leadership skills are needed? These are all expressions of culture and values, but too often they are perceived as random. Employees do not have to be concerned about being friends with the CEO, competing with each other, and other political challenges when these processes are viewed as transparent and fair. A good culture sets these processes up so they feed into and off of each other. Practices Practices include everything from company events, running meetings, feedback processes, to how decisions are made. Do you have repeatable decision-making processes in place? Are meeting participants expected to be collaborative and consensus-driven, or is some conflict OK? What should managers talk about in performance reviews? Practices need to change as the company changes — as it grows, reorganizes, or faces new threats. Once-useful practices can quickly become stale, meaningless, or even counter-productive. If the original intent of an off-site retreat was to help teams bond, what needs to shift now that the company has tripled in size? Great organizations and leaders know that the culture stuff is the hard stuff. Culture takes time to define. It takes work to execute. Yet, if the time is spent (1) really understanding the behaviors expected throughout the organization; (2) identifying the systems and processes that will continue to help those behaviors be expressed and sustained; and (3) shaping practices that help employees and the organization become better, then you can close your culture gaps, and stop your best people from saying, “I know it’s a great culture, but I am leaving.”
By Shazamme System User September 20, 2021
Dr Louise Newson answers the question ‘how does menopause affect women at work?’. #12 in a series of videos with sign language. Video Transcript: I am Dr. Louise Newson. I am a GP and Menopause Expert in West Midlands. It can affect people really in so many ways. Up to 10% of women actually consider giving up work because of the menopause and I think that could be an underestimation. Because of the symptoms that you can experience – especially the concentration and the energy symptoms that can really affect and like I said before, the lack of confidence that you have – so lots of people really struggle. In the past they might have given up work – retired earlier…but it’s harder…the pensions are different. And also as women we work very hard to get to certain stage in our career and to give it up because of menopause is very hard. The other thing is as a GP it is very difficult when people want time off work because of their menopausal symptoms…to actually write “menopausal symptoms” on a sick note isn’t good and it can cause a lot of problems with the employers because lots of people don’t understand how severe menopausal symptoms can be. So for a woman to explain to her employer that they are menopausal just gets a bit of a laugh and maybe not taken seriously. So maybe they want to have something like “anxiety and depression” written on their sick note but then that again deals with collusion and their employer might think “Oh my goodness! I don’t want someone who is depressed and anxious working for me” and it builds up barriers. So I think it’s very hard. It’s not just a taboo for women; it’s a taboo for people in general and when I talk to people and say I am really passionate about the menopause… I deal with women and help women, lots of people laugh and say “Why would you do that?” and it’s so interesting because it makes a massive difference if you can help these women in a very difficult and a very vulnerable time of their lives.
By Shazamme System User March 17, 2020
Why listening is a leaders’ secret superpower. We all respect bosses that can command an audience, lead with a strategy and a plan, be assertive and decisive, right?What if that leader could put their ego to one side and listen more than talk, give others the stage and not always offer up solutions, encourage ideas and opinions from their people; would that show weakness or an inspirational strength? “Good leaders ask great questions that inspire others to think more, learn more, do more and become more.” John Maxwell From my experience of managing leaders at various stages in their career; from newly promoted team leaders to senior leadership teams, it is easy to become fixated on the view that they need to be the one with the answers, devise the plan, make the decisions, show no weakness. It’s easy to get into mental ruts; we often think the same thoughts day after day, leaders can spend so much time trying to convince others of their views, that they overlook the option of asking their people for their valuable and often insightful opinion, instead choosing to do what they have always done. Gallup’s 2019 study on ‘The Future of Work’ finds that in today’s world, in order to succeed, great leaders need to be able to master two things: 1) Bring multiple teams together 2) Make great decisions. Both require an ability to connect people and see situations from all angles. Collaboration requires trust and strong two-way communication. “Two of the fastest ways to connect with other people are to ask questions and ask for help” John. Maxwell. Ultimately, being listened to feels good. It shows people that you are more interested in them then yourself. Listening without distraction helps your people thrive. Surely that should be the goal for both your people and your organisation. Listening with intention: Increases trust and creates psychological safety allowing others to feel they have a voice. Creates a willingness in your people to reflect in a non-defensive way. To share both their strengths and weaknesses. Puts people in a safe state where they can open up and share thoughts and ideas. Enhances your relationship with that person quickly and deeply. Allows you to learn far more about your people and you will be able to engage them to a greater level. So why do so few leaders truly ace at it? Listening to someone with intention is a skill, like a muscle that we need to develop and grow. It’s hard work; it takes time to practice and master. Distractions are everywhere, all the time, making time for quality conversations is tough. It’s quicker to communicate at speed and get the job done, everyone is time short, right? But what would happen if you did master it? Your people would thrive, creativity in problem solving would be higher; co-created plans generate more engagement, a culture of psychological safety would form, others would follow your lead and listen intently to their peers and your customers. Learning to listen and putting the ego to one side are core themes running through Engage. Enable. Empower your people to work happy programme. Investing in your leaders and managers to help them enable their people to thrive sees returns across all areas of your business, from engagement to retention, productivity and customer satisfaction. Online, one to one or in groups, bespoke to the needs of your organisation, if you want to know more, DM me and I’d love to discuss how I can help you help your people thrive.